On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:18 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> This would be harmless, so I am planning to apply the patch to HEAD only.
I forgot to mention that this was added in v14. Done that way.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:58 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 15 Mar 2023, at 11:18, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > While working on something else, I noticed that the “if (entry->conn
> > == NULL)” test after doing disconnect_pg_server() when re-establishing
> > a given connection in GetConnection()
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:40 PM Richard Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:18 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> While working on something else, I noticed that the “if (entry->conn
>> == NULL)” test after doing disconnect_pg_server() when re-establishing
>> a given connection in GetConnection() is p
> On 15 Mar 2023, at 11:18, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> While working on something else, I noticed that the “if (entry->conn
> == NULL)” test after doing disconnect_pg_server() when re-establishing
> a given connection in GetConnection() is pointless, because the former
> function ensures that entry->
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:18 PM Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> While working on something else, I noticed that the “if (entry->conn
> == NULL)” test after doing disconnect_pg_server() when re-establishing
> a given connection in GetConnection() is pointless, because the former
> function ensures that ent
