On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 08:39:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-01-05 18:57:55 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 03:51:15PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> Also, leaving translatability aside, why was *any* of this backpatched?
>
> >> Tom has
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-01-05 18:57:55 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 03:51:15PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Also, leaving translatability aside, why was *any* of this backpatched?
>> Tom has preferred that I backpatch all safe patches so we keep that code
>> c
On 2018-01-05 18:57:55 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 03:51:15PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-01-05 14:20:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 03:51:15PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-01-05 14:20:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> > >
> > > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
> >
> >
On 2018-01-05 14:20:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> >
> > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
>
> Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks
> translatab
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:37:58PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > > pg_upgrade: simp
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:31:51PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
>
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
>> > >
>> > > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> > >
> > > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
> >
> > Hmm. We don't normally do th
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
>> >
>> > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
>>
>> Hmm
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> >
> > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
>
> Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
>
> Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks translatability.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.co
12 matches
Mail list logo