Hello Alexander,
> Hello Tatsuo-san,
>
> 11.10.2024 07:54, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> ...
> - number of transactions actually pocessed: 1 (tps = 410.846343)
> ...
>> Patch pushed.
>
> Please consider fixing a typo sneaked in that commit: pocessed ->
> processed?
Thank you for the repor
Hello Tatsuo-san,
11.10.2024 07:54, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
...
- number of transactions actually pocessed: 1 (tps = 410.846343)
...
Patch pushed.
Please consider fixing a typo sneaked in that commit: pocessed -> processed?
Best regards,
Alexander
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:54:54 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the fix. Here is the new run with the v2 patch. The result
> >>> looks good to me.
> >>>
> >>> src/bin/pgbench/pgbench -p 11002 -c1 -t 1 -f c.sql -f d.sql
> >>> --failures-detailed -r test
> >>> pgbench (18devel)
> >
>>> Thanks for the fix. Here is the new run with the v2 patch. The result
>>> looks good to me.
>>>
>>> src/bin/pgbench/pgbench -p 11002 -c1 -t 1 -f c.sql -f d.sql
>>> --failures-detailed -r test
>>> pgbench (18devel)
>>> starting vacuum...end.
>>> transaction type: multiple scripts
>>> scaling
>> > I overlooked the "NaN% of total" in per-script results.
>> > I think this NaN also should be avoided.
>> >
>> > I fixed the number of transactions in per-script results to include
>> > skipped and failed transactions. It prevents to print "total of NaN%"
>> > when any transactions are not s
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:00:04 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > I overlooked the "NaN% of total" in per-script results.
> > I think this NaN also should be avoided.
> >
> > I fixed the number of transactions in per-script results to include
> > skipped and failed transactions. It prevents to p
> I overlooked the "NaN% of total" in per-script results.
> I think this NaN also should be avoided.
>
> I fixed the number of transactions in per-script results to include
> skipped and failed transactions. It prevents to print "total of NaN%"
> when any transactions are not successfully proce
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 17:59:34 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > I would like to improve the following two points on the result outputs
> > of pgbench related to faild transaction. The patch is attached.
> >
> > (1) Output per-script statistics even when there are no successful
> > transaction i
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> I would like to improve the following two points on the result outputs
> of pgbench related to faild transaction. The patch is attached.
>
> (1) Output per-script statistics even when there are no successful
> transaction if there is any failed transactions due to serialization
> o
