On 05/02/21 19:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chapman Flack writes:
>> I've appended the comments we use for them at $work, anyway.
>
> IMO these would have to be shortened quite a bit to be friendly for
> "\du+" displays. I'm not against the concept though.
I'm certainly not wedded to the exact wording
Chapman Flack writes:
> Is there an inherent technical or policy reason for pg_upgrade not to
> preserve comments on predefined roles (or on predefined objects generally)?
I think this is absolutely out of scope for pg_dump. We generally expect
that system objects' properties are not dumped, bec
