Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we do do a bump for beta4, I'd be strongly tempted to address the
>> lack of a unique index for pg_constraint as well, cf
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10110.1535907...@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Uh, if we add
On 2018-Sep-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > > This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> > > however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> > > column only to rem
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> > however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> > column only to remove it in pg12 ...
>
> Catversion bumps during
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> > however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> > column only to remove it in pg12 ...
Yeah, I really don't think we want
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> > however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> > column only to remove it in pg12 ...
>
> Catversion bumps during
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> column only to remove it in pg12 ...
Catversion bumps during beta are routine. If we had put out rc1
I'd say it was too late, but
