On 5/18/18 11:26, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> How about using capital -K in pg_basebackup? Or maybe it doesn't need a
>>> short option at all.
>>
>> +1 for no short option.
>
> Makes sense to me, I wasn't happy about the -k back then (and I think I
> solicited feedback on that).
>
> PFA a patch whi
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > The new pg_basebackup -k option stands for --no-verify-checksums. That
> > is nearly the opposite of initdb -k, which is for enabling checksums. I
> > think it could be confusing to have two related tools use the s
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:46:37AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > The new pg_basebackup -k option stands for --no-verify-checksums. That
> > is nearly the opposite of initdb -k, which is for enabling checksums. I
> > think it could be confusing to have two related too
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> The new pg_basebackup -k option stands for --no-verify-checksums. That
> is nearly the opposite of initdb -k, which is for enabling checksums. I
> think it could be confusing to have two related tools use the same
> option letter for nearly opposite purposes.
> How ab
Hi
I think having only long option is enough
regards, Sergei
