Hi,
On 2022-11-22 12:51:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.
>
> > @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum
> > WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL,
> > WAIT_EVE
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.
> @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum
> WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL,
> WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST,
> WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY,
> -
Hi,
On 2022-11-22 00:03:23 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:01 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > On November 21, 2022 12:58:16 PM PST, Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > >+1 for making a group of individual names s
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:01 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On November 21, 2022 12:58:16 PM PST, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
Hi,
On November 21, 2022 12:58:16 PM PST, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>> > > I couldn't quite decide what wait_event_type to best g
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > > I couldn't quite decide what wait_event_type to best group this under? In
> > > the
> > > attached patch I put it under timeouts,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 6:10 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> I was wondering about that too - but decided against it because it would only
> show a single wait event. And wouldn't really describe spinlocks as a whole,
> just the "extreme" delays. If we wanted to report the spin waits more
> granular, we
Hi,
On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > I couldn't quite decide what wait_event_type to best group this under? In
> > the
> > attached patch I put it under timeouts, which doesn't seem awful.
>
> I think it would be best to
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> The lwlock wait queue scalability issue [1] was quite hard to find because of
> the exponential backoff and because we adjust spins_per_delay over time within
> a backend.
>
> I think the least we could do to make this easier would be to signa
