On 2019-Jan-25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Would anybody object too hard if I move hash_any() and friends to
> src/backend/utils/hash/hashfn.c and the declarations to
> src/include/utils/hashutils.h?
Pushed this. I ended up adding an #include of utils/hashutils.h to
access/hash.h, so that any third
Hello
On 2019-Jan-25, Andres Freund wrote:
> I hate the current split quite a bit, albeit for somewhat different
> reasons. We make things like tag_hash, uint32_hash unnecessarily more
> expensive by adding an entirely useless external function call. And
> some of these can be fairly hot (e.g. fo
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-01-25 16:35:18 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Would anybody object too hard if I move hash_any() and friends to
>> src/backend/utils/hash/hashfn.c and the declarations to
>> src/include/utils/hashutils.h?
> I hate the current split quite a bit, albeit for somewhat
Hi,
On 2019-01-25 16:35:18 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just noticed (once again) that we have hash_any() declared in
> src/access/hash.h (the header file for the hash index AM) rather than
> somewhere in utils/, for no good reason other than perhaps there was no
> better place when it was int
