I wrote:
> I can take a look at this, since it's basically a followup
> to 774171c4f.
Pushed with some cleanup and further hacking.
regards, tom lane
jian he writes:
> now changed to
> static PartitionStrategy parsePartitionStrategy(char *strategy, int location,
> core_yyscan_t yyscanner);
I can take a look at this, since it's basically a followup
to 774171c4f.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:49 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Why remove parsePartitionStrategy? You could just add an "int location"
> parameter to it.
>
now changed to
static PartitionStrategy parsePartitionStrategy(char *strategy, int location,
core_yyscan_t yyscanner);
From 2ec4466576778e42d393
Why remove parsePartitionStrategy? You could just add an "int location"
parameter to it.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Los cuentos de hadas no dan al niño su primera idea sobre los monstruos.
Lo que le dan es su primera idea de la posible derro
