These syntax extensions would make the jsonpath syntax a super powerful query
language capable of most nosql workloads people would have. Especially querying
jsonpath with a variable key to look for is a sorely missed feature from the
language. I would be open to reviewing the patches if need be
As discussed in [1], we're taking this opportunity to return some
patchsets that don't appear to be getting enough reviewer interest.
This is not a rejection, since we don't necessarily think there's
anything unacceptable about the entry, but it differs from a standard
"Returned with Feedback" in
Hi,
Ok, we'll rebase it onto actual master for the next iteration.
Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:17 PM Greg Stark wrote:
> Well I still think this would be a good candidate to get reviewed.
>
> But it currently needs a rebase and it's the last day of the CF so I
> guess it'll get moved f
Well I still think this would be a good candidate to get reviewed.
But it currently needs a rebase and it's the last day of the CF so I
guess it'll get moved forward again. I don't think "returned with
feedback" is helpful given there's been basically no feedback :(
Hi,
On 2022-03-21 21:09, Greg Stark wrote:
This patch seems to be getting ignored. Like David I'm a bit puzzled
because it doesn't seem like an especially obscure or difficult patch
to review. Yet it's been multiple years without even a superficial
"does it meet the coding requirements" review l
Op 21-03-2022 om 21:13 schreef Greg Stark:
Hm. Actually... These changes were split off from the JSON_TABLE
patches? Are they still separate or have they been merged into those
other patches since? I see the JSON_TABLE thread is getting more
comments do those reviews include these patches?
T
Hm. Actually... These changes were split off from the JSON_TABLE
patches? Are they still separate or have they been merged into those
other patches since? I see the JSON_TABLE thread is getting more
comments do those reviews include these patches?
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 16:09, Greg Stark wrote:
>
This patch seems to be getting ignored. Like David I'm a bit puzzled
because it doesn't seem like an especially obscure or difficult patch
to review. Yet it's been multiple years without even a superficial
"does it meet the coding requirements" review let alone a design
review.
Can we get a volunt
On 3/3/21 9:44 AM, David Steele wrote:
On 3/4/20 3:18 PM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
On 04.03.2020 19:13, David Steele wrote:
On 2/27/20 10:57 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
Attached patches implement several useful jsonpath syntax extensions.
I already published them two years ago in the original SQL/
On 3/4/20 3:18 PM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
On 04.03.2020 19:13, David Steele wrote:
On 2/27/20 10:57 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
Attached patches implement several useful jsonpath syntax extensions.
I already published them two years ago in the original SQL/JSON thread,
but then after creation of
On 04.03.2020 19:13, David Steele wrote:
Hi Nikita,
On 2/27/20 10:57 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
Attached patches implement several useful jsonpath syntax extensions.
I already published them two years ago in the original SQL/JSON thread,
but then after creation of separate threads for SQL/JSON
Hi Nikita,
On 2/27/20 10:57 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
Attached patches implement several useful jsonpath syntax extensions.
I already published them two years ago in the original SQL/JSON thread,
but then after creation of separate threads for SQL/JSON functions and
JSON_TABLE I forgot about th
12 matches
Mail list logo
