Alexander Korotkov writes:
> Users, who likes existing behavior of handling <@ operator in intarray
> opclasses, may be advised to rewrite their queries as following.
> "col <@ const" => "col <@ const AND col && const"
Oh, that's a good suggestion --- it will work, and work reasonably
well, with
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason appears to be that the condition for descending through a
> non-leaf index key for the RTContainedBy case is incorrectly optimistic:
> it supposes that we only need to descend into subtrees whose union key
> overlaps the query array.
