Hi,
On 2023-04-03 12:00:30 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> It's not great, I agree. I tried to make it easier to read in this version by
> a) changing GetVisibilityMapPins() as I proposed
> b) added a new variable "recheckVmPins", that gets set in
>if (unlockedTargetBuffer)
>and
>if (oth
Hi,
On 2023-04-03 14:25:59 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 4/3/23 00:40, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2023-03-28 19:17:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2023-03-28 18:21:02 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> Here's a draft patch.
> >>
> >> Attached is v2, with a stupid bug fixed and
On 4/3/23 00:40, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-03-28 19:17:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2023-03-28 18:21:02 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Here's a draft patch.
>>
>> Attached is v2, with a stupid bug fixed and a bit of comment / pgindent
>> polish.
>
> I'd welcome some review (
Hi,
On 2023-03-28 19:17:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-03-28 18:21:02 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Here's a draft patch.
>
> Attached is v2, with a stupid bug fixed and a bit of comment / pgindent
> polish.
I'd welcome some review (Tomas?), but otherwise I'm planning to push ahead
w
Hi,
On 2023-03-28 18:21:02 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Here's a draft patch.
Attached is v2, with a stupid bug fixed and a bit of comment / pgindent
polish.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
>From 6f27018765f167a8d2a52bc7c9068cb09ca8d82c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund
Date: Mon, 24 Oct
Hi,
On 2023-03-25 11:17:07 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't see how that's easily possible with the current lock ordering
> rules. At least without giving up using RBM_ZERO_AND_LOCK for extending or
> stuffing even more things to happen with the the extension lock held, which I
> don't think
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:17 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> Thinking more about this, I think there's no inherent deadlock danger with
> reading the VM while holding a buffer lock, "just" an efficiency issue. If we
> avoid needing to do IO nearly all the time, by trying to pin the right page
> before
Hi,
On 2023-03-25 12:57:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2023-03-25 14:34:25 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >> Can't we ensure we actually lock the vm buffer too in ReadBufferBI,
> >> before calling ReadBufferExtended? Or am I confused and that's not
> >> possible for some r
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2023-03-25 14:34:25 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Can't we ensure we actually lock the vm buffer too in ReadBufferBI,
>> before calling ReadBufferExtended? Or am I confused and that's not
>> possible for some reason?
> Note that this is using P_NEW. I.e. we don't know t
Hi,
On 2023-03-25 14:34:25 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 3/25/23 03:57, Andres Freund wrote:
> > 2) Change relevant code so that we only return a valid vmbuffer if we could
> > do
> >so without blocking / IO and, obviously, skip updating the VM if we
> >couldn't get the buffer.
> >
>
On 3/25/23 03:57, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Starting with
>
> commit 7db0cd2145f2bce84cac92402e205e4d2b045bf2
> Author: Tomas Vondra
> Date: 2021-01-17 22:11:39 +0100
>
> Set PD_ALL_VISIBLE and visibility map bits in COPY FREEZE
>
That's a bummer :-(
> RelationGetBufferForTuple do
11 matches
Mail list logo