David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Spring Zhong wrote:
> > The plan is apparently inefficient, since the hash aggregate goes after the
> > Cartesian product. We could expect the query's performance get much
> > improved if the HashAggregate node can be pushed down to the SCAN n
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Spring Zhong wrote:
> The plan is apparently inefficient, since the hash aggregate goes after the
> Cartesian product. We could expect the query's performance get much improved
> if the HashAggregate node can be pushed down to the SCAN node.
> Is someone has suggest
