Re: git instructions

2018-02-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:59 PM, David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner < > ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > >> >> > >> > Yes, this used to be the case, and is the reason behind the original >> > recommendation. It's what they

Re: git instructions

2018-02-06 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner < ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > > > > > Yes, this used to be the case, and is the reason behind the original > > recommendation. It's what they call the "dumb HTTP protocol" in the > > docs. This is not the case when you use git-http-backend

Re: git instructions

2018-02-06 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
On 02/01/2018 05:35 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Chapman Flack > wrote: > > On 02/01/2018 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > in saying that git:// is faster than https://. In fact, we have some > > reports and te

Re: git instructions

2018-02-01 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Chapman Flack wrote: > On 02/01/2018 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > in saying that git:// is faster than https://. In fact, we have some > > reports and testing that https:// can be significantly faster (due to > other > > reasons). > Can you elaborate on t

Re: git instructions

2018-02-01 Thread Chapman Flack
On 02/01/2018 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > in saying that git:// is faster than https://. In fact, we have some > reports and testing that https:// can be significantly faster (due to other > reasons). Can you elaborate on the other reasons? It occurs to me that there might be cases in which