On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:55 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Indeed.
>
> Well, the problem is the lack of grammatical agreement between "waiting"
> and "release". It's poor English at least.
It's not correct for formal writing, but I think a lot of people would
find it acceptable in casual speech. At an
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 07:57:02AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:55 AM Liu, Huailing
>> wrote:
* This module contains the code for waiting and release★ of backends.
>>> I think the word marked★ should be 'releasing'.
>> It could be changed
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 07:57:02AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:55 AM Liu, Huailing
> wrote:
>> * This module contains the code for waiting and release★ of backends.
>> * All code in this module executes on the primary. The core streaming
>> * replication transport remains
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:55 AM Liu, Huailing wrote:
> * This module contains the code for waiting and release★ of backends.
> * All code in this module executes on the primary. The core streaming
> * replication transport remains within WALreceiver/WALsender modules.
>
> I think the word marked★ s
