David Rowley writes:
> I've pushed this. I backpatched due to the typo in the fsync GUC
> description. I'd have only pushed to master if it were just the
> comment typos.
FTR, I do not think you should have back-patched. You created extra
work for the translation team, and the mistake is subtl
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 14:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:28PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > Those all look fine to me too.
>
> +1.
I've pushed this. I backpatched due to the typo in the fsync GUC
description. I'd have only pushed to master if it were just the
comme
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:28PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 19:56, Peter Smith wrote:
>> In passing I found/fixed a bunch of similar misuses in comments.
>
> Those all look fine to me too.
+1.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 19:56, Peter Smith wrote:
> gettext_noop("The server will use the fsync() system call in several
> places to make "
> "sure that updates are physically written to disk. This insures "
> "that a database cluster will recover to a consistent state after "
> "an operating
