On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:20:52AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Done.
Thanks. There does not seem to be anything left here, so I have
marked this open item as fixed.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:20:52AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-08-19 01:10:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2021-08-19 17:05:01 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Okay. Would you like to write a patch then?
> >
> > I'll push something in a bit...
>
> Done.
Thanks. I was kind of
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:20 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-19 01:10:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2021-08-19 17:05:01 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Okay. Would you like to write a patch then?
> >
> > I'll push something in a bit...
>
> Done.
Thanks!
On 2021-08-19 01:10:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-08-19 17:05:01 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Okay. Would you like to write a patch then?
>
> I'll push something in a bit...
Done.
On 2021-08-19 17:05:01 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay. Would you like to write a patch then?
I'll push something in a bit...
- Andres
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 03:29:40PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:05 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > The thread of this open item is now idle for 10 days and there does
> > not seem to be a lot of progress. Bruce, this is assigned to you.
> > Are you planning to look a
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:05 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> The thread of this open item is now idle for 10 days and there does
> not seem to be a lot of progress. Bruce, this is assigned to you.
> Are you planning to look at it?
I'm really sorry for the lack of answer on my side, I had too many
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 11:29:24AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Ah indeed! This was quite a long thread so I didn't try to see when
> that changed. I also now realize that I made a typo in the patch
> where I s/loop/look/ which was then changed to s/look/lock/. The
> comment should be somethin
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:06 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-08 11:53:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2021-08-08 13:46:39 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > > I suspect that to make the elog.c usage safe, we'll have to clear
> > > > MyBEEntry in
> > > > pgstat_beshutdown_hook(
Hi,
On 2021-08-08 11:53:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-08-08 13:46:39 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > I suspect that to make the elog.c usage safe, we'll have to clear
> > > MyBEEntry in
> > > pgstat_beshutdown_hook().
> >
> > I agree, and a quick test indeed fix your scenario. It
Hi,
On 2021-08-08 13:46:39 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 04:44:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > As currently implemented those pgstat_get_my_query_id() calls are not
> > safe. It's fine during backend startup because MyBEEntry is not set, but
> > during shutdown t
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 01:46:39PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 04:44:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > As currently implemented those pgstat_get_my_query_id() calls are not
> > safe. It's fine during backend startup because MyBEEntry is not set, but
> > during shu
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 04:44:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> As currently implemented those pgstat_get_my_query_id() calls are not
> safe. It's fine during backend startup because MyBEEntry is not set, but
> during shutdown that's not ok, because we never unset MyBEEntry.
>
> andres@awork3:
13 matches
Mail list logo