On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 04:33:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am planning to get this one applied around the end of this week on
> Friday for HEAD, that should be enough if there are comments and/or
> objections.
And done for now. If there are any remarks and/or objections, of
course feel
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 02:34:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I agree that it is inconsistent that we allow infinite values to go
> through this function call even for fields that are not listed as
> supported by the documentation. So, yes, I think that what you are
> doing the right thing by
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 03:09:17PM -0500, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> When looking at the date_trunc function, I noticed that it wasn't
> rejecting invalid units if the value was infinite. It's slightly
> annoying to fix this, but we already do something very similar for
> date_part. I have attached a
