Re: cpluspluscheck/headerscheck require build in REL_16_STABLE

2024-04-26 Thread Marina Polyakova
On 2024-04-27 09:14, John Naylor wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:21 AM John Naylor wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova wrote: > Everything seems to work with this patch, thank you! Glad to hear it -- I'll push next week when I get back from vacation, unless there are obj

Re: cpluspluscheck/headerscheck require build in REL_16_STABLE

2024-04-26 Thread John Naylor
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:21 AM John Naylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova > wrote: > > Everything seems to work with this patch, thank you! > > Glad to hear it -- I'll push next week when I get back from vacation, > unless there are objections. Pushed, thanks for th

Re: cpluspluscheck/headerscheck require build in REL_16_STABLE

2024-04-16 Thread John Naylor
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova wrote: > > On 2024-04-13 08:40, John Naylor wrote: > > so that they build fine on PG16 as well. The problem is, not all the > > required headers are generated when invoking `make headerscheck`. The > > attached patch brings in some Makefile rules fr

Re: cpluspluscheck/headerscheck require build in REL_16_STABLE

2024-04-15 Thread Marina Polyakova
On 2024-04-13 08:40, John Naylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM Marina Polyakova wrote: ... In the other branches everything is fine: these problems begin with commits [2] (jsonpath_gram.h) and [3] (gram.h) and in the master branch there're no such problems after commit [4]. The att

Re: cpluspluscheck/headerscheck require build in REL_16_STABLE

2024-04-12 Thread John Naylor
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM Marina Polyakova wrote: > > Hello, hackers! > > When running cpluspluscheck/headerscheck on REL_16_STABLE [1] I found > that everything was ok only if it was preceded by a build and make > maintainer-clean was not used: I can reproduce this. > In the other branch