On 13 January 2018 at 01:57, Christian Rossow
wrote:
> Hi Fabien,
>
> > I think that the probability of getting these useful things into pg is
> > alas small. In the mean time, you may package and register it as an
> > extension?
> I aimed to close the asymmetry between bit vector operations (the
Hi Fabien,
> I think that the probability of getting these useful things into pg is
> alas small. In the mean time, you may package and register it as an
> extension?
I aimed to close the asymmetry between bit vector operations (they also
offer xor/and/etc.) and bytea operations. My code is more o
Hello,
working with binary is certainly lacked in Postgres.
I would be happy if these can be pulled in to Postgres, as there's not
always a possibility to install a C based extension, and bit tricks are
needed for efficient SQL-level implementations of custom datatypes.
Another bitwise thing, w
Hello Christian,
Currently, `bytea` does not have any bitwise logical operations yet.
This issue came up in an old thread from 2006 [1], but nobody seemed to
have picked this issue so far.
I remember this one because I needed them for checksuming set of rows.
There is a whole set of missing
