Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For reference, here is the complete hotfix.
Applied on skate/snapper, mussurana/tadarida, ibisbill/kittiwake.
Best regards,
Tom Turelinckx
On 9/19/20 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> Here's how cross version upgrade testing works. It uses a cached version of
>> the binaries and data directory. The cache is only refreshed if there's a
>> buildfarm run on that branch. If not, the cached version will just sit the
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Here's how cross version upgrade testing works. It uses a cached version of
> the binaries and data directory. The cache is only refreshed if there's a
> buildfarm run on that branch. If not, the cached version will just sit there
> till kingdom come. So all this should
On 9/19/20 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 9/18/20 6:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Done, you should be able to remove @#@ (NONE, bigint) from the
>>> kill list.
>> crake tests pg_upgrade back to 9.2, so I had to mangle those static
>> repos for non-live branches like this:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 9/18/20 6:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Done, you should be able to remove @#@ (NONE, bigint) from the
>> kill list.
> crake tests pg_upgrade back to 9.2, so I had to mangle those static
> repos for non-live branches like this:
Oh, hm. Now that you mention that, I see sn
On 9/18/20 6:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> Yeah, probably worth doing. It's a small enough change and it's only in
>>> the test suite.
>> OK, I'll go take care of that in a bit.
> Done, you should be able to remove @#@ (NONE, bigint) from the
> kill list.
>
>
I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> Yeah, probably worth doing. It's a small enough change and it's only in
>> the test suite.
> OK, I'll go take care of that in a bit.
Done, you should be able to remove @#@ (NONE, bigint) from the
kill list.
regards, tom lane
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 9/18/20 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, that's not a postfix operator ... oh, it's because it depends on the
>> numeric_fac function alias which we also removed. We could eliminate
>> the need to drop it if we changed the definition to use "factorial"
>> instead of "n
On 9/18/20 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 9/18/20 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I intentionally let that happen, figuring that it'd be good to get some
>>> buildfarm cycles on the new code in pg_upgrade that does this check.
>>> But now we have to think about updating th
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 9/18/20 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I intentionally let that happen, figuring that it'd be good to get some
>> buildfarm cycles on the new code in pg_upgrade that does this check.
>> But now we have to think about updating the test. I think the best
>> bet is just to
On 9/18/20 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Unsurprisingly, commit 1ed6b8956 has led to the buildfarm's
> cross-version upgrade tests no longer working, eg
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tadarida&dt=2020-09-18%2013%3A06%3A52
>
> Checking for reg* data types in user tables
11 matches
Mail list logo
