On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> Additionally, there is significant potential for external applications to
> leverage the PostgreSQL stats system to collect metrics instead of relying
> on relational tables, promising a highly efficient solution. In such cases,
>
On 12/02/2025 01:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:43:30AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
Because I saw this being moved to the new CF: I continue to *strenuously*
object to this design. As outlined upthread, I think it's going into the
completely wrong direction.
Right. F
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:43:30AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> Because I saw this being moved to the new CF: I continue to *strenuously*
> object to this design. As outlined upthread, I think it's going into the
> completely wrong direction.
Right. FWIW, I'm not sure that we can absolutely just
Hi,
On 2025-01-14 12:54:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:46:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I'd rather use RecoveryInProgress() here even if XLogInsertAllowed()
> > is a synonym of that, minus the update of LocalXLogInsertAllowed for
> > the local process.
>
>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:46:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'd rather use RecoveryInProgress() here even if XLogInsertAllowed()
> is a synonym of that, minus the update of LocalXLogInsertAllowed for
> the local process.
I've applied v2-0002 for the new header as it is useful on its own.
Re
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 11:29:26AM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> === 1
>
> + * Copyright (c) 2001-2024, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>
> As pgstat_kind.h is a new file, s/Copyright (c) 2001-2024/Copyright (c) 2025/
> maybe?
Fixed.
> No more comments, as v2-0002 is "just" moving so
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 08:08:42PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> I can't think of a real case where we would want to WAL log the stats
> themselves, rather than re-emitting stats during replay based on the WAL
> record of the "underlying object".
>
> Do you have counter-examples?
I'm not sure if
Hi,
On 2024-12-27 12:32:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While brainstorming on the contents of the thread I have posted a
> couple of days ago, I have been looking at what could be done so as
> pgstats and WAL-logging could work together. This was point 2) from
> this message:
> https://www.po
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 09:52:31AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 12:32:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > For clarity, the patch set has been split into several pieces, I hope
> > rather edible:
> > - 0001, a fix I've posted on a different thread [1], used in patc
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 12:32:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> For clarity, the patch set has been split into several pieces, I hope
> rather edible:
> - 0001, a fix I've posted on a different thread [1], used in patch
> 0004 to test this new facility.
> - 0002, a refactoring piece to be able t
10 matches
Mail list logo
