On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:04 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > > "full page records" seems to be showing the number of full page
> > > > images, not the record having full page images.
> > >
> > > I am not sure what exactly is a diffe
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > "full page records" seems to be showing the number of full page
> > > images, not the record having full page images.
> >
> > I am not sure what exactly is a difference but it is the records
> > having full page images. Julien c
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:58 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, A
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> > >
> > > 1) records; 2) pages ("full pag
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> >
> > 1) records; 2) pages ("full page images"); 3) bytes
> >
> > That is exactly like sort (method/type/
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
>
> 1) records; 2) pages ("full page images"); 3) bytes
>
> That is exactly like sort (method/type/size) and hash (buckets/batches/size),
> and *not* like buffers, which show
> > > > > Regarding
> > > > > v10-0004-Add-option-to-report-WAL-usage-in-EXPLAIN-and-au.patch:
> > > > > I think there should be additional spaces before "full" and before
> > > > > "bytes":
> > > > >
> > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> > > > >
> > > > > Compare w
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:05 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:32:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote in
> > > > Regarding
> > > > v10-0004
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:32:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> >
> > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > wrote in
> > > Regarding v10-0004-Add-option-to-report-WAL-usage-in-EXPLAIN-and-au.patch:
> > > I think there sh
Thanks all for the feedback.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:02 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> >
> > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > wrote in
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > In thre
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
> in
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> > > statement in a way quite simila
At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
in
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> > statement in a way quite similar to how we expose BufferUsage data.
> > The way it exposes seems rea
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> statement in a way quite similar to how we expose BufferUsage data.
> The way it exposes seems reasonable to me and no one else raises any
> objection. It could be th
15 matches
Mail list logo