On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:27 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > And pushed! I think an improvement in CI times of this degree is pretty
> > awesome.
>
> +1
>
> A lot of CI compute time is saved. The Cirrus account[1] was
> previously hitting the 4
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> And pushed! I think an improvement in CI times of this degree is pretty
> awesome.
+1
A lot of CI compute time is saved. The Cirrus account[1] was
previously hitting the 4 job limit all day long, and now it's often
running 1 or 2 jobs when
Hi,
On 2023-02-02 17:47:37 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 3:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Yea, there's a problem where packer on windows doesn't seem to abort after a
> > powershell script error out. The reason isn't yet quiete clear. I think
> > Bilal
> > is working on a workar
Hi,
On 1/12/2023 3:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Yea, there's a problem where packer on windows doesn't seem to abort after a
powershell script error out. The reason isn't yet quiete clear. I think Bilal
is working on a workaround.
That should be fixed now. Also, adding a patch for PG15. There
Hi,
On 2023-01-11 17:21:21 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> > Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
> are needs to get pulled on every CI run, also they are slow to run
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:20 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-01-10 09:22:12 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > There is more than 2x speed gain when VMs are used.
> >
> > One consideration is that if windows runs twice as fast, we'll suddenly
> > start using twice as many resources at cirrus/goog
Hi,
On 2023-01-10 09:22:12 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > There is more than 2x speed gain when VMs are used.
>
> One consideration is that if windows runs twice as fast, we'll suddenly
> start using twice as many resources at cirrus/google/amazon - the
> windows task has been throttling everyth
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
> are needs to get pulled on every CI run, also they are slow to run
Hi,
It didn't work again. Sending numbers until I figure out how to solve this.
Scheduling Step:
VM + VS 2019: 00.17m
Container + VS 2019: 03.51m
VM + MinGW64: 00.16m
Container + MinGW64: 04.28m
Execution step:
VM + VS 2019: 12.16m
Container + VS 2019: 26.02m
VM + MinGW64: 07.55m
Container
Hi,
Tables didn't seem nice on web interface. Re-sending with correct
formatting.
Scheduling step:
| VS 2019 | MinGW64
--
VM | 00:17m | 00:16m
--
Container | 03:51m | 04:28m
11 matches
Mail list logo
