Re: Use relative rpath if possible

2019-08-01 Thread Thomas Munro
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:01 AM Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut writes: > >> rebased patch attached, no functionality changes > > > I poked at this a bit, and soon found that it fails check-world, > > because the isolationtester binary is built with an rpath that > > only works if

Re: Use relative rpath if possible

2019-07-07 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> rebased patch attached, no functionality changes > I poked at this a bit, and soon found that it fails check-world, > because the isolationtester binary is built with an rpath that > only works if it's part of the temp install tree, which it ain't. Oh ... j

Re: Use relative rpath if possible

2019-07-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > rebased patch attached, no functionality changes I poked at this a bit, and soon found that it fails check-world, because the isolationtester binary is built with an rpath that only works if it's part of the temp install tree, which it ain't. /home/postgres/pgsql/src/t

Re: Use relative rpath if possible

2019-07-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
rebased patch attached, no functionality changes On 2019-06-27 13:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On several popular operating systems, we can use relative rpaths, using > the $ORIGIN placeholder, so that the resulting installation is > relocatable. Then we also don't need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH du