On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 10:28:05PM +0800, Zhang Mingli wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2024 at 20:35 +0800, Matthias van de Meent ,
> wrote:
>> PFA a trivial one-line patch that makes that a bit more consistent.
>
> LGTM.
Makes sense to me as well. Thanks for the patch.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description
Hi,
Zhang Mingli
www.hashdata.xyz
On Oct 9, 2024 at 20:35 +0800, Matthias van de Meent ,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whilst doing some digging in parallel code, I noticed that
> max_parallel_maintenance_workers is registered as guc with a manual
> value of 1024, while max_parallel_workers_per_gather uses
>
