On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:18 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:57 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:01 PM Nathan Bossart
> > wrote:
> > > +1
> >
> > So, Thomas ... any chance you could commit this? So that my patch
> > stops making cfbot sad?
>
> Done. Thanks b
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:57 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:01 PM Nathan Bossart
> wrote:
> > +1
>
> So, Thomas ... any chance you could commit this? So that my patch
> stops making cfbot sad?
Done. Thanks both for the reviews.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:01 PM Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +1
So, Thomas ... any chance you could commit this? So that my patch
stops making cfbot sad?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:48:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> The patch LGTM, too. Thanks for investigating and writing the code.
> The part about how the reserved kernel memory prevents the bug from
> appearing on 32-bit systems but not 64-bit systems running in 32-bit
> mode is pretty interestin
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:04 PM Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:03:53AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > xlogreader.c has a pointer overflow bug, as revealed by the
> > combination of -fsanitize=undefined -m32, the new 039_end_of_wal.pl
> > test and Robert's incremental backup patc
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:03:53AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> xlogreader.c has a pointer overflow bug, as revealed by the
> combination of -fsanitize=undefined -m32, the new 039_end_of_wal.pl
> test and Robert's incremental backup patch[1]. The bad code tests
> whether an object could fit using
