On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:50:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The resulting patch is attached. Does that look good?
And committed. Thanks all for taking the time to review.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2018, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
>> On 06/10/2018 13:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>>> +# Time to create a corruption
>
> That looks a bit weird, maybe "some corruption"? Or maybe it's just me
> not
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2018, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> On 06/10/2018 13:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > What do you think about the updated version attached?
> > +# Time to create a corruption
That looks a bit weird, maybe "some corupption"? Or maybe it's just me
not being a nat
On 06/10/2018 13:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> It's too late for v11 though at this point I guess?
>
> Unfortunately yes.
>
>> I think it would be easy to also test the -r command-line option, as we
>> already create a table.
>
> G
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> It's too late for v11 though at this point I guess?
Unfortunately yes.
> I think it would be easy to also test the -r command-line option, as we
> already create a table.
Good idea. Let's add this test.
> That comment should read
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:26:45AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The topic of $subject has been discussed a bit times, resulting in a
> couple of patches on the way:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180830200258.gg15...@paquier.xyz
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cabuevezekr