On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:55:43PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Sep 2021, at 16:05, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>>> Do we actually need --target-restore-command at all? It seems to me
>>> that we have all we need with --restore-target-wal, and that's not
>>> really instinctive to pass down a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:32 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Doesn't apply once more: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_3213.log
>
Thanks for the reminder, a rebased version is attached.
Regards
--
Alexey Kondratov
From df56b5c7b882e781fdc0b92e7a83331f0baab094 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: A
Hi,
On 2021-11-05 15:10:29 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > 4 нояб. 2021 г., в 17:55, Daniel Gustafsson написал(а):
> >
> > The patch no longer applies, can you submit a rebased version please?
>
> Thanks, Daniel! PFA rebase.
Doesn't apply once more: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_3213.log
> 4 нояб. 2021 г., в 17:55, Daniel Gustafsson написал(а):
>
> The patch no longer applies, can you submit a rebased version please?
Thanks, Daniel! PFA rebase.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
v3-0001-Allow-providing-restore_command-as-a-command-line.patch
Description: Binary data
> On 14 Sep 2021, at 16:05, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> Do we actually need --target-restore-command at all? It seems to me
>> that we have all we need with --restore-target-wal, and that's not
>> really instinctive to pass down a command via another command..
>
> Currently we know that --restore-t
> 14 сент. 2021 г., в 18:41, Daniel Gustafsson написал(а):
>
>>> Besides this patch looks good and is ready for committer IMV.
>
> A variant of this patch was originally objected against by Michael, and as
> this
> version is marked Ready for Committer I would like to hear his opinions on
>
>> Besides this patch looks good and is ready for committer IMV.
A variant of this patch was originally objected against by Michael, and as this
version is marked Ready for Committer I would like to hear his opinions on
whether the new evidence changes anything.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:05 AM Andrey Borodin wrote:
> There is a small bug
> + /*
> +* Take restore_command from the postgresql.conf only if it is not
> already
> +* provided as a command line option.
> +*/
> + if (!restore_wal && restore_command == NULL)
>
> 29 июня 2021 г., в 19:34, Alexey Kondratov
> написал(а):
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:06 PM Alexey Kondratov
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:42 PM Andrey Borodin wrote:
>>>
>>> If we run 'pg_rewind --restore-target-wal' there must be restore_command in
>>> config of target insta
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:06 PM Alexey Kondratov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:42 PM Andrey Borodin wrote:
> >
> > If we run 'pg_rewind --restore-target-wal' there must be restore_command in
> > config of target installation. But if the config is not within
> > $PGDATA\postgresql.conf pg_
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:42 PM Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
> If we run 'pg_rewind --restore-target-wal' there must be restore_command in
> config of target installation. But if the config is not within
> $PGDATA\postgresql.conf pg_rewind cannot use it.
> If we run postmaster with `-c
> config
11 matches
Mail list logo
