On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 11:44, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> At Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:12:45 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote in
> > latest works. It dones't consider the case of explict target timlines
> > so it's just a PoC. (So this doesn't work if recovery_target_timeline
> > is set to 2 f
At Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:44:40 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:12:45 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote in
> > latest works. It dones't consider the case of explict target timlines
> > so it's just a PoC. (So this doesn't work if recovery_target_timeline
>
At Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:12:45 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> latest works. It dones't consider the case of explict target timlines
> so it's just a PoC. (So this doesn't work if recovery_target_timeline
> is set to 2 for the "standby" in the repro.)
So, finally I noticed that the fun
At Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:45:59 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:44:40 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote in
> > My understanding is that backup archives are supposed to remain valid
> > even after PITR or equivalently a lagging standby promoting.
>
> Sorry, I was dim becaus
At Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:44:40 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote in
> My understanding is that backup archives are supposed to remain valid
> even after PITR or equivalently a lagging standby promoting.
Sorry, I was dim because of maybe catching a cold:p
On second thought. everything works fine if the firs
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 11:30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> primary_restored did a time-travel to past a bit because of the
> recovery_target=immediate. In other words, the primary_restored and
> the replica diverge. I don't think it is legit to connect a diverged
> standby to a primary.
primary_r
Forgot a caveat.
At Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:34:13 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:50:09 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote in
> > When standby is recovering to a timeline that doesn't have any segments
> > archived yet it will just blindly blow past the timeline switch point
Sorry, a correction needed..
At Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:29:57 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:50:09 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote in
> > When standby is recovering to a timeline that doesn't have any segments
> > archived yet it will just blindly blow past the timeline
At Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:50:09 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote in
> When standby is recovering to a timeline that doesn't have any segments
> archived yet it will just blindly blow past the timeline switch point and
> keeps on recovering on the old timeline. Typically that will eventually
> result in an er
