On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 22:30, David Rowley wrote:
> Unless anyone thinks differently about this, I plan on pushing the
> patch in the next day or so.
Pushed (63b1af943)
David
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 11:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Just reading it over quickly, I noticed a comment mentioning
> "aggcombinedfn" which I suppose should be "aggcombinefn".
Thanks. I've fixed that locally.
> No particular opinion on whether this is a net reduction
> of logical complexity.
I had anot
David Rowley writes:
> Now that the pg15 branch is open, does anyone have any objections to this
> patch?
Just reading it over quickly, I noticed a comment mentioning
"aggcombinedfn" which I suppose should be "aggcombinefn".
No particular opinion on whether this is a net reduction
of logical co
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 23:03, David Rowley wrote:
> I've rebased this and I'd like to propose this small cleanup for pg15.
Now that the pg15 branch is open, does anyone have any objections to this patch?
David
