Hi Amit!
Thank you for your feedback, I'll check it out in a couple of days and
reply.
--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/
Hi Nikita,
I was looking at the patch you posted on Feb 3. Two high-level comments:
* The documentation additions are missing.
* It looks like the patch mixes refactoring changes with new
functionality, which makes it harder to follow what's existing vs.
new. Could you separate these changes so
Hi Amit!
No, JSON_TABLE is ok. I've meant that in the previous approach to PLAN
clause
implementation there were some wrong tests.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:05 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:11 AM Nikita Malakhov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers!
> >
> > This thre
Hi Nikita,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:11 AM Nikita Malakhov wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> This thread is further work continued in [1], where Amit Langote
> suggested starting discussion on the remaining SQL/JSON feature
> 'PLAN clause for JSON_TABLE' anew.
>
> We'd like to help with merging SQL/JSO
Nikita Malakhov писал(а) 2025-02-03 02:43:
Hi hackers!
Patch has been rebased onto the current master.
--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/
Hi!
Tested on Mac with 'make check', all tests passed OK.
--
Best regards,
Vladlen P
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, failed
Implements feature: tested, failed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Hi!
Proposed patch tested at Macosx, compiled and build without warni
On 2024-12-17 Tu 10:11 AM, Nikita Malakhov wrote:
Hi hackers!
This thread is further work continued in [1], where Amit Langote
suggested starting discussion on the remaining SQL/JSON feature
'PLAN clause for JSON_TABLE' anew.
We'd like to help with merging SQL/JSON patches into vanilla,
and h
