Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 06.09.24 21:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * I don't really like the new control structure, or rather lack of
>> structure, in hashvalidate. In particular the uncommented
>> s/break/continue/ changes look like typos. They aren't, but can't
>> you do this in a less confusing
On 06.09.24 21:43, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
hashvalidate(), which validates the signatures of support functions for
the hash AM, contains several hardcoded exceptions.
...
This patch removes those exceptions by providing new support functions
that have the proper declared signat
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> hashvalidate(), which validates the signatures of support functions for
> the hash AM, contains several hardcoded exceptions.
> ...
> This patch removes those exceptions by providing new support functions
> that have the proper declared signatures. They internally sha
