Re: Removal of operator_precedence_warning

2020-12-04 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > Reading the reports mentioned in those commits, it doesn't look like any > of them were actually using the feature -- they all seem to have come > across the problems by accidents of varying nature. The two oldest reports look like the submitters had operator_precedence_w

Re: Removal of operator_precedence_warning

2020-12-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2020-Dec-04, Tom Lane wrote: > I think it's time for $SUBJECT. We added this GUC in 9.5, which > will be EOL by the time of our next major release, and it was never > meant as more than a transitional aid. Moreover, it's been buggy > as heck (cf abb164655, 05104f693, 01e0cbc4f, 4cae471d1), an