Hi,
On 2025-03-24 02:26:35 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > With autovacuum = off, all of these fluctuations go away.
>
> So you are suggesting disabling autovacuum during the postgres_fdw regression
> test?
I don't think that's a good fix in this case.
> Just my idea to stabilize the test with
Hello Masao-san and Melanie,
Thank you for your attention to this!
23.03.2025 19:26, Fujii Masao wrote:
With autovacuum = off, all of these fluctuations go away.
So you are suggesting disabling autovacuum during the postgres_fdw regression
test?
No, I'd prefer to have the test stable wit
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:00 AM Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Interestingly enough, with "log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0" added to
> TEMP_CONFIG, I can't see "automatic vacuum/analyze" messages related
> to ft2/ "S 1"."T 1", so autovacuum somehow affects contents of this table
> indirectly.
>
> Wi
On 2025/03/23 23:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
Hello hackers,
A recent buildfarm failure [1] with the following diagnostics:
72/72 postgresql:postgres_fdw-running / postgres_fdw-running/regress
ERROR 19.04s exit status 1
postgres_fdw-running/regress/results/postgres_f
