Jelte Fennema-Nio writes:
> On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 16:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But if we could have *some* kind of explainable basis for
>> assigning DEBUGn levels, I think our lives would be better.
> Agreed. I'll start with a concrete proposal then:
> DEBUG1 is reserved for usage by extensions
On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 16:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't have an opinion about the merits of this exact change, but
> I wish somebody would go through all our DEBUGn messages and come up
> with some coherent proposal for what the various levels should be
> used for. Right now I think those choices
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:33 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio
wrote:
> When testing extensions using pgregress, it can be useful to introduce
> some new DEBUG logs which are specific to the extension and change the
> log level during part of the of the test.
>
> There's a problem though: Often a "rehashing c
"Jelte Fennema-Nio" writes:
> When testing extensions using pgregress, it can be useful to introduce
> some new DEBUG logs which are specific to the extension and change the
> log level during part of the of the test.
> There's a problem though: Often a "rehashing catalog cache ..." debug
> messa
