Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches

2020-12-01 Thread Thomas Munro
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane wrote: > I'm also wondering a bit why the issue isn't affecting the newer > branches. It's certainly not because we made the test shorter ... I looked at htop while it was building the 9.x branches and saw pg_basebackup sitting in D state waiting for glac

Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches

2020-12-01 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Munro writes: > > Unfortunately, eelpout got kicked off the nice shiny ARM server it was > > running on so last week I moved it to a rack mounted Raspberry Pi. It > > seems to be totally I/O starved causing some timeouts to be rea

Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches

2020-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Munro writes: > Unfortunately, eelpout got kicked off the nice shiny ARM server it was > running on so last week I moved it to a rack mounted Raspberry Pi. It > seems to be totally I/O starved causing some timeouts to be reached, > and I'm looking into fixing that by adding fast storage.

Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches

2020-12-01 Thread Thomas Munro
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:36 AM Tom Lane wrote: > Perhaps this is just a question of the machine being too slow to complete > the test, in which case we ought to raise wal_sender_timeout. But it's > weird that it would've started to fail just now, because I don't really > see any changes in those