Re: ReadRecord wrongly assumes randAccess after 38a957316d.

2020-01-28 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:12:05 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote in > On 28/01/2020 12:44, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > While rebasing a patch, I found that after the commit 38a957316d > > (Sorry for overlooking that.), ReadRecord sets randAccess reverse > > way. That is, it sets randAccess to false

Re: ReadRecord wrongly assumes randAccess after 38a957316d.

2020-01-28 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 28/01/2020 12:44, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: While rebasing a patch, I found that after the commit 38a957316d (Sorry for overlooking that.), ReadRecord sets randAccess reverse way. That is, it sets randAccess to false just after a XLogBeginRead() call. The attached fixes that. Thanks, applied!