Re: Re: pgbench randomness initialization

2018-03-16 Thread Fabien COELHO
But now the documentation is back to its original state of silence on what base or how many bases might be allowed. Could it just say "or an unsigned decimal integer value"? Then no one will wonder. Done in the attached. Thanks for the reviews. -- Fabien.diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench

Re: Re: pgbench randomness initialization

2018-03-15 Thread Chapman Flack
I'm sorry, I must have missed your reply on the 5th somehow. On 03/05/18 07:01, Fabien COELHO wrote: > I must admit that I'm not too happy with the result as well, so I dropped > the octal/hexadecimal parsing. That seems perfectly reasonable to me; perfectly adequate to accept only one base. But