Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two

2018-03-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:42:35AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > I'm super excited by the idea of multi-version support in TAP, if that's > what you mean. > > Why? Because I use TAP heavily in extensions. Especially replication > extensions. Which like to talk across multiple versions. I currently

Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two

2018-03-21 Thread Craig Ringer
On 22 March 2018 at 09:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:51:04AM -0400, David Steele wrote: > > On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > It seems the consensus is that we'll need a build farm update before we > > can move forward with the patch and that we don't need to wait l

Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two

2018-03-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:51:04AM -0400, David Steele wrote: > On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > It seems the consensus is that we'll need a build farm update before we > can move forward with the patch and that we don't need to wait long for > people to upgrade. > > Andrew, do you have a date

Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two

2018-03-21 Thread David Steele
On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> On 3/4/18 16:09, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> If you want to do this soon I can put out a Buildfarm Client release >>> fairly quickly. > >> I think the dependency is mostly the other way around. How quickly >> would build farm owners