David Steele wrote:
> On 3/1/18 2:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > TBH, I think we should reject this patch. While it's not huge,
> > it's not trivial either, and I find the grammar changes rather ugly.
> > The argument for using the feature to fix pg_dump issues has evaporated,
> > but I don't see a
Hi Jing,
On 3/1/18 2:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jing Wang writes:
>> [ support_CURRENT_DATABASE_keyword_v4.7.patch ]
>
> TBH, I think we should reject this patch. While it's not huge,
> it's not trivial either, and I find the grammar changes rather ugly.
> The argument for using the feature to fi
