Stephen Frost writes:
> Yeah, that should also be updated. Perhaps you'd send an updated patch
> which includes fixing that too and maybe adds clarifying documentation
> to COPY which mentions what happens when RLS is enabled on the relation?
I couldn't find anything in copy.sgml that seemed to
Stephen Frost writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yugo NAGATA writes:
I think this is a bug because the current behaviour is different from
the documentation.
>>> I agree, it shouldn't do that.
> Yeah, I agree based on what the COPY table TO docs say should be
> happening.
Yeah, the doc
Greetings,
* Yugo NAGATA (nag...@sraoss.co.jp) wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:47:23 -0500
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Yugo NAGATA writes:
> > > Antonin Houska wrote:
> > >> While working on [1] I noticed that if RLS gets enabled, the COPY TO
> > >> command
> > >> includes the contents of child t
Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:45:57 +0100
> Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> > While working on [1] I noticed that if RLS gets enabled, the COPY TO command
> > includes the contents of child table into the result, although the
> > documentation says it should not:
> >
> > "COPY TO c
On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:47:23 -0500
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yugo NAGATA writes:
> > Antonin Houska wrote:
> >> While working on [1] I noticed that if RLS gets enabled, the COPY TO
> >> command
> >> includes the contents of child table into the result, although the
> >> documentation says it should no
Yugo NAGATA writes:
> Antonin Houska wrote:
>> While working on [1] I noticed that if RLS gets enabled, the COPY TO command
>> includes the contents of child table into the result, although the
>> documentation says it should not:
> I think this is a bug because the current behaviour is differen
On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:45:57 +0100
Antonin Houska wrote:
> While working on [1] I noticed that if RLS gets enabled, the COPY TO command
> includes the contents of child table into the result, although the
> documentation says it should not:
>
> "COPY TO can be used only with plain tables,
