On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>>
>
> That's right. But, shouldn't a partition that not at all fall in the
> partition range be rejected when user tries to attach it. I feel we
> should at least try throwing a WARNING message for it. Thoughts?
>
One can add constraints c
On 2018/01/23 15:55, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>> However, we don't make it fail because the table has a constraint that
>> contradicts the partition constraint. Attach succeeds in the absence of
>> any violating rows and the end result is that the table/partition has
>> contradictory constraints (th
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> On 2018/01/23 14:35, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>> I have created a regular table with CHECK constraint on the partition
>> key column and it conflicts with the partition constraint but, still,
>> i could attach the table with the partitioned tab
On 2018/01/23 14:35, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> I have created a regular table with CHECK constraint on the partition
> key column and it conflicts with the partition constraint but, still,
> i could attach the table with the partitioned table. Here is what i am
> trying to do,
>
> postgres[76308]=#
