On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:39:49AM +1100, Timothy Nelson wrote:
> Great! I'm not surprised it's been around a long time -- I didn't think I
> could be the only one to think of it.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up on Postgres-XL -- I'd missed that one somehow.
>
> I'm going to include the words "ar
Timothy Nelson writes:
> Great! I'm not surprised it's been around a long time -- I didn't think I
> could be the only one to think of it.
> Thanks for the heads-up on Postgres-XL -- I'd missed that one somehow.
FWIW, we also have some in-core history with passing plans around,
for parallel-quer
Great! I'm not surprised it's been around a long time -- I didn't think I
could be the only one to think of it.
Thanks for the heads-up on Postgres-XL -- I'd missed that one somehow.
I'm going to include the words "architecture" and "replication" so that
people searching the archives in the futu
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Timothy Nelson
wrote:
> I'm expecting that people will pick the idea apart, and wanted to know
> what people think of it.
>
Thanks for the proposal. This is actually a model that's been around for a
very long time. And, in fact, variations of it (e.g. parsing done
