On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:45 AM Korry Douglas wrote:
> It sounds like there is no reliable way to get the information that I’m
> looking for, is that right?
Correct. And if there were, it could only be used to write bugs. Let
me see if I can demonstrate... I'll use the file_fdw patch from th
> That's only a superficial problem. You don't even know if or when the
> workers that are launched will all finish up running your particular
> node, because (for example) they might be sent to different children
> of a Parallel Append node above you (AFAICS there is no way for a
> participant
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:46 AM Korry Douglas wrote:
> >> But, nworkers_launched is always set to 0 in
> >> InitializeDSMForeignScan(), so that won’t work. Any other ideas?
> >
> > At that state it's simply not yet known how many workers will be
> > actually launched (they might not start success
>> But, nworkers_launched is always set to 0 in
>> InitializeDSMForeignScan(), so that won’t work. Any other ideas?
>
> At that state it's simply not yet known how many workers will be
> actually launched (they might not start successfully or such). Why do
> you need to know it there and not la
Hi,
Don't top quote on these list...
On 2019-05-15 13:31:59 -0400, Korry Douglas wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answer Andres. You’re right - it was
> parallel_tuple_cost that was getting in my way; my query returns about 6
> million rows so I guess that can add up.
>
> If I change parallel_t
Thanks for the quick answer Andres. You’re right - it was parallel_tuple_cost
that was getting in my way; my query returns about 6 million rows so I guess
that can add up.
If I change parallel_tuple_scan from 0.1 to 0.0001, I get a parallel foreign
scan.
With 4 workers, that reduces my execu
Hi,
On 2019-05-15 12:55:33 -0400, Korry Douglas wrote:
> Hi all, I’m working on an FDW that would benefit greatly from parallel
> foreign scan. I have implemented the callbacks described
> here:https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/fdw-callbacks.html#FDW-CALLBACKS-PARALLEL.
> and I see a big i