I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> In PL/Tcl, we used to have these CONST84 and CONST86 things, for similar
>> reasons. Maybe that would be another approach.
> Yeah, if the simple cast approach turns out to create warnings,
> we'll have to fall back on using actually different declarations.
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 27.01.24 20:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't mind adopting the "const" --- it's a good idea in isolation.
>> The trouble is in fixing our code to work with both old and new
>> libxml2 versions. We could thrash around with a configure test or
>> something, but I think t
On 27.01.24 20:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Buildfarm member caiman has been failing build for a couple weeks now.
The reason turns out to be that recent libxml2 has decided to throw
a "const" into the signature required for custom error handlers.
(API compatibility? What's that?)
I don't mind adopting
On 2024-01-27 Sa 14:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Buildfarm member caiman has been failing build for a couple weeks now.
The reason turns out to be that recent libxml2 has decided to throw
a "const" into the signature required for custom error handlers.
(API compatibility? What's that?)
I don't mind ad
