Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita writes:
> > I think the “or a tuple has come for a different relation than that
> > for the accumulated tuples" part in the comment is a leftover from an
> > earlier version of the patch [1]. As the code shows, we do not handl
Etsuro Fujita writes:
> I think the “or a tuple has come for a different relation than that
> for the accumulated tuples" part in the comment is a leftover from an
> earlier version of the patch [1]. As the code shows, we do not handle
> that case anymore, so I think we should remove that part fr
