Rod Taylor writes:
> So it's the timestamp_%_timestamptz operator functions that are missing the
> flag?
I think those are not marked leakproof because they aren't leakproof;
they can throw errors for some inputs, or at least the required
conversions invoke enough code that it's hard to be sure t
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 14:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor writes:
> > Should now/current_date be marked leakproof?
>
> Since it has no argument, that should be moot.
>
Gah, you're right.
It seems to be because the below clause is timestamp without time zone:
WHERE current_date - interval '1 d
Rod Taylor writes:
> Should now/current_date be marked leakproof?
Since it has no argument, that should be moot.
regards, tom lane
