> I'm sorry for not having read (and not reading) the other thread yet,
> but what was the reason we couldn't store that oid in a column in the
> pg_s_p_vacuum-view?
> Could you summarize the other solutions that were considered for this issue?
Thanks for your feedback!
The reason we cannot sti
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 16:45, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [1] is a ready-for-committer enhancement to pg_stat_progress_vacuum which
> exposes
> the total number of indexes to vacuum and how many indexes have been vacuumed
> in
> the current vacuum cycle.
>
> To even further improve vis
