On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:41:18PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Feb-17, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 17 Feb 2025, at 20:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > Obviously, we could talk about extending the regression tests'
> > > support for these cases, but I'm really dubious that it's worth
On 2025-Feb-17, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2025, at 20:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Obviously, we could talk about extending the regression tests'
> > support for these cases, but I'm really dubious that it's worth
> > the work.
>
> Agreed.
This means that unless Mark is willing to instal
> On 17 Feb 2025, at 20:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>
>> Isn't it postgres version mostly? We fixed so the testsuite passed on FIPS
>> enabled machines by just not using anything that violates FIPS but I don't
>> remember anything OpenSSL version specific.
>
> No, there are
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> On 17 Feb 2025, at 17:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I believe the main concern is OpenSSL 1.x versus 3.x, not a specific
>> platform.
> Isn't it postgres version mostly? We fixed so the testsuite passed on FIPS
> enabled machines by just not using anything that violates FIP
> On 17 Feb 2025, at 17:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mark Wong writes:
>> On Feb 17, 2025, at 2:36 AM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> As I understand, both of these Ubuntu versions ship with OpenSSL 1.1,
>>> though of course OpenSSL 3 could be installed on them. Should I just
>>> delete these requests?
Mark Wong writes:
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 2:36 AM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> As I understand, both of these Ubuntu versions ship with OpenSSL 1.1,
>> though of course OpenSSL 3 could be installed on them. Should I just
>> delete these requests?
> I’m away from my desk until later this week so I do
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 2:36 AM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So in light of this conversation, what to do about the following pending
> requests?
>
> pgbfprod=> select format('%s %s', operating_system, os_version) as "OS" from
> pending();
> OS
>
Hello,
So in light of this conversation, what to do about the following pending
requests?
pgbfprod=> select format('%s %s', operating_system, os_version) as "OS" from
pending();
OS
-
Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (Focal
Mark Wong writes:
> That's my fault. I did a sloppy job copying configs etc from the s390x
> fips animals and forgot about the OS versions, branches, etc. Peter
> Eisentraut reminded me I think I cleaned that all up.
Cool, thanks.
regards, tom lane
Hi Tom,
On 2/14/25 10:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I see that somebody decided to crank up some animals running
RHEL8 and RHEL9 with FIPS mode turned on. The RHEL9 animals
pass on v17 and master, but not older branches; the RHEL8
animals pass nowhere. This is unsurprising given that the
v17-era comm
Jacob Champion writes:
> I'm not buildfarm@, but these animals have now been stopped until we
> get them figured out. Sorry -- and thanks for the ping Tom!
Thanks for that. Just to be clear, I think it'd be great to run
those RHEL9 animals on v17 and later. I'm only questioning whether
it's wor
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:51 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 14 Feb 2025, at 19:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'm kind of disinclined to do all the work that'd be needed to turn
> > these animals completely green, especially when the reason to do it
> > seems to be that someone decided we shoul
> On 14 Feb 2025, at 19:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm kind of disinclined to do all the work that'd be needed to turn
> these animals completely green, especially when the reason to do it
> seems to be that someone decided we should without any community
> consultation. Perhaps others have different
13 matches
Mail list logo
